Fossil SCM
Tightened up the opening paragraph of "Linux vs SQLite" section of fossil-v-git.
Commit
0297ae7fae3633f607a30f039ee92bc0c666d29a763a646345376643af1b1e77
Parent
845262742eaaedd…
1 file changed
+2
-4
+2
-4
| --- www/fossil-v-git.wiki | ||
| +++ www/fossil-v-git.wiki | ||
| @@ -115,21 +115,19 @@ | ||
| 115 | 115 | |
| 116 | 116 | |
| 117 | 117 | <h3 id="vs-linux">2.3 Linux vs. SQLite</h3> |
| 118 | 118 | |
| 119 | 119 | Fossil and Git promote different development styles because each one was |
| 120 | -specifically designed to support the primary authors' main software | |
| 120 | +specifically designed to support the creator's main software | |
| 121 | 121 | development project: [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Linus_Torvalds|Linus |
| 122 | 122 | Torvalds] designed Git to support development of |
| 123 | 123 | [https://www.kernel.org/|the Linux kernel], and |
| 124 | 124 | [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/D._Richard_Hipp|D. Richard Hipp] designed |
| 125 | 125 | Fossil to support the development of [https://sqlite.org/|SQLite]. |
| 126 | -SQLite is much more widely deployed than the Linux kernel, but for | |
| 127 | -Linux-based systems, the kernel is the more fundamental component. | |
| 128 | 126 | Both projects must rank high on any objective list of "most |
| 129 | 127 | important FOSS projects," yet these two projects are almost entirely unlike |
| 130 | -one another. | |
| 128 | +one another. So, too, are these two DVCSes. | |
| 131 | 129 | |
| 132 | 130 | In the following sections, we will explain how three key differences |
| 133 | 131 | between Linux and SQLite dictated the design of each DVCS's low-friction |
| 134 | 132 | usage path. |
| 135 | 133 | |
| 136 | 134 |
| --- www/fossil-v-git.wiki | |
| +++ www/fossil-v-git.wiki | |
| @@ -115,21 +115,19 @@ | |
| 115 | |
| 116 | |
| 117 | <h3 id="vs-linux">2.3 Linux vs. SQLite</h3> |
| 118 | |
| 119 | Fossil and Git promote different development styles because each one was |
| 120 | specifically designed to support the primary authors' main software |
| 121 | development project: [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Linus_Torvalds|Linus |
| 122 | Torvalds] designed Git to support development of |
| 123 | [https://www.kernel.org/|the Linux kernel], and |
| 124 | [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/D._Richard_Hipp|D. Richard Hipp] designed |
| 125 | Fossil to support the development of [https://sqlite.org/|SQLite]. |
| 126 | SQLite is much more widely deployed than the Linux kernel, but for |
| 127 | Linux-based systems, the kernel is the more fundamental component. |
| 128 | Both projects must rank high on any objective list of "most |
| 129 | important FOSS projects," yet these two projects are almost entirely unlike |
| 130 | one another. |
| 131 | |
| 132 | In the following sections, we will explain how three key differences |
| 133 | between Linux and SQLite dictated the design of each DVCS's low-friction |
| 134 | usage path. |
| 135 | |
| 136 |
| --- www/fossil-v-git.wiki | |
| +++ www/fossil-v-git.wiki | |
| @@ -115,21 +115,19 @@ | |
| 115 | |
| 116 | |
| 117 | <h3 id="vs-linux">2.3 Linux vs. SQLite</h3> |
| 118 | |
| 119 | Fossil and Git promote different development styles because each one was |
| 120 | specifically designed to support the creator's main software |
| 121 | development project: [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Linus_Torvalds|Linus |
| 122 | Torvalds] designed Git to support development of |
| 123 | [https://www.kernel.org/|the Linux kernel], and |
| 124 | [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/D._Richard_Hipp|D. Richard Hipp] designed |
| 125 | Fossil to support the development of [https://sqlite.org/|SQLite]. |
| 126 | Both projects must rank high on any objective list of "most |
| 127 | important FOSS projects," yet these two projects are almost entirely unlike |
| 128 | one another. So, too, are these two DVCSes. |
| 129 | |
| 130 | In the following sections, we will explain how three key differences |
| 131 | between Linux and SQLite dictated the design of each DVCS's low-friction |
| 132 | usage path. |
| 133 | |
| 134 |