Fossil SCM
Reworked the intro to fossil-v-git.wiki to flow better and be clearer.
Commit
16cb9c0268c7f0036167058abe9d849810b289524f7fd307b7a3ee1548072d96
Parent
79c2cb083152d2c…
1 file changed
+8
-7
+8
-7
| --- www/fossil-v-git.wiki | ||
| +++ www/fossil-v-git.wiki | ||
| @@ -1,12 +1,9 @@ | ||
| 1 | 1 | <title>Fossil Versus Git</title> |
| 2 | 2 | |
| 3 | 3 | <h2>1.0 Don't Stress!</h2> |
| 4 | 4 | |
| 5 | -If you start out using one DVCS and later decide you like the other better, | |
| 6 | -you can easily [./inout.wiki | move your content].¹ | |
| 7 | - | |
| 8 | 5 | The feature sets of Fossil and [http://git-scm.com | Git] overlap in |
| 9 | 6 | many ways. Both are |
| 10 | 7 | [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Distributed_version_control | distributed |
| 11 | 8 | version control systems] managing a |
| 12 | 9 | [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Directed_acyclic_graph | directed acyclic |
| @@ -15,17 +12,21 @@ | ||
| 15 | 12 | repository clone. In both systems, new content added to the local repo |
| 16 | 13 | clone can be pushed up to a remote parent, and changes to the remote can |
| 17 | 14 | be easily pulled down to the local clone. Both systems offer bisecting, |
| 18 | 15 | private branches, a stash, etc. |
| 19 | 16 | |
| 20 | -There are also, however, many important differences between these two | |
| 21 | -DVCSes. We summarize the major differences in the following table, then | |
| 22 | -detail those differences in the following text. | |
| 17 | +Fossil has inbound and outbound Git conversion features, so if you start | |
| 18 | +out using one DVCS and later decide you like the other better, you can | |
| 19 | +easily [./inout.wiki | move you version-controlled file content].¹ | |
| 20 | + | |
| 21 | +The purpose of this document is to cover the important differences | |
| 22 | +between the two, especially those that impact the user experience. | |
| 23 | 23 | |
| 24 | 24 | Keep in mind that you are reading this on a Fossil website, and though |
| 25 | 25 | we try to be fair, the information here |
| 26 | -might be biased in favor of Fossil. Ask around for second opinions from | |
| 26 | +might be biased in favor of Fossil, if only because we spend most of our | |
| 27 | +time using Fossil, not Git. Ask around for second opinions from | |
| 27 | 28 | people who have used <em>both</em> Fossil and Git. |
| 28 | 29 | |
| 29 | 30 | |
| 30 | 31 | <h2>2.0 Differences Between Fossil And Git</h2> |
| 31 | 32 | |
| 32 | 33 |
| --- www/fossil-v-git.wiki | |
| +++ www/fossil-v-git.wiki | |
| @@ -1,12 +1,9 @@ | |
| 1 | <title>Fossil Versus Git</title> |
| 2 | |
| 3 | <h2>1.0 Don't Stress!</h2> |
| 4 | |
| 5 | If you start out using one DVCS and later decide you like the other better, |
| 6 | you can easily [./inout.wiki | move your content].¹ |
| 7 | |
| 8 | The feature sets of Fossil and [http://git-scm.com | Git] overlap in |
| 9 | many ways. Both are |
| 10 | [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Distributed_version_control | distributed |
| 11 | version control systems] managing a |
| 12 | [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Directed_acyclic_graph | directed acyclic |
| @@ -15,17 +12,21 @@ | |
| 15 | repository clone. In both systems, new content added to the local repo |
| 16 | clone can be pushed up to a remote parent, and changes to the remote can |
| 17 | be easily pulled down to the local clone. Both systems offer bisecting, |
| 18 | private branches, a stash, etc. |
| 19 | |
| 20 | There are also, however, many important differences between these two |
| 21 | DVCSes. We summarize the major differences in the following table, then |
| 22 | detail those differences in the following text. |
| 23 | |
| 24 | Keep in mind that you are reading this on a Fossil website, and though |
| 25 | we try to be fair, the information here |
| 26 | might be biased in favor of Fossil. Ask around for second opinions from |
| 27 | people who have used <em>both</em> Fossil and Git. |
| 28 | |
| 29 | |
| 30 | <h2>2.0 Differences Between Fossil And Git</h2> |
| 31 | |
| 32 |
| --- www/fossil-v-git.wiki | |
| +++ www/fossil-v-git.wiki | |
| @@ -1,12 +1,9 @@ | |
| 1 | <title>Fossil Versus Git</title> |
| 2 | |
| 3 | <h2>1.0 Don't Stress!</h2> |
| 4 | |
| 5 | The feature sets of Fossil and [http://git-scm.com | Git] overlap in |
| 6 | many ways. Both are |
| 7 | [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Distributed_version_control | distributed |
| 8 | version control systems] managing a |
| 9 | [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Directed_acyclic_graph | directed acyclic |
| @@ -15,17 +12,21 @@ | |
| 12 | repository clone. In both systems, new content added to the local repo |
| 13 | clone can be pushed up to a remote parent, and changes to the remote can |
| 14 | be easily pulled down to the local clone. Both systems offer bisecting, |
| 15 | private branches, a stash, etc. |
| 16 | |
| 17 | Fossil has inbound and outbound Git conversion features, so if you start |
| 18 | out using one DVCS and later decide you like the other better, you can |
| 19 | easily [./inout.wiki | move you version-controlled file content].¹ |
| 20 | |
| 21 | The purpose of this document is to cover the important differences |
| 22 | between the two, especially those that impact the user experience. |
| 23 | |
| 24 | Keep in mind that you are reading this on a Fossil website, and though |
| 25 | we try to be fair, the information here |
| 26 | might be biased in favor of Fossil, if only because we spend most of our |
| 27 | time using Fossil, not Git. Ask around for second opinions from |
| 28 | people who have used <em>both</em> Fossil and Git. |
| 29 | |
| 30 | |
| 31 | <h2>2.0 Differences Between Fossil And Git</h2> |
| 32 | |
| 33 |