Fossil SCM

Spelling and grammar fixes to javascript.md.

wyoung 2020-08-20 05:13 trunk
Commit 209f73cbc251f0d25e98b98c5e6934a3990b2dcd78594611b606123701850990
1 file changed +3 -4
--- www/javascript.md
+++ www/javascript.md
@@ -46,20 +46,20 @@
4646
[cg]: ./contribute.wiki
4747
4848
4949
## <a id="debate"></a>Arguments Against JavaScript & Our Rebuttals
5050
51
-There many common arguments against the use of JavaScript. Rather than
51
+There are many common arguments against the use of JavaScript. Rather than
5252
rehash these same arguments on the [forum][ffor], we distill the common
5353
ones we’ve heard before and give our stock answers to them here:
5454
5555
1. “**It increases the size of the page download.**”
5656
5757
The heaviest such pages served by Fossil only have about 8 kB of
5858
compressed JavaScript. (You have to go out of your way to get Fossil
5959
to serve uncompressed pages.) This is negligible, even over very
60
- slow data connnections. If you are still somehow on a 56 kbit/sec
60
+ slow data connections. If you are still somehow on a 56 kbit/sec
6161
analog telephone modem, this extra script code would download in
6262
about a second.
6363
6464
Most JavaScript-based Fossil pages use less code than that.
6565
@@ -223,11 +223,10 @@
223223
The primary difference between these two for our purposes is that
224224
NoScript lets you select scripts to run on a page on a case-by-case
225225
basis, whereas uBlock Origin delegates those choices to a group of
226226
motivated volunteers who maintain allow/block lists to control all
227227
of this; you can then override UBO’s stock rules as needed.
228
-
229228
230229
10. “**My browser doesn’t even *have* a JavaScript interpreter.**”
231230
232231
The Fossil open source project has no full-time developers, and only
233232
a few of these part-timers are responsible for the bulk of the code
@@ -555,11 +554,11 @@
555554
556555
As of mid-2020, the informal provisional plan is to increase Fossil
557556
UI's use of JavaScript considerably compared to its historically minimal
558557
uses. To that end, a framework of Fossil-centric APIs is being developed
559558
in conjunction with new features to consolidate Fossil's historical
560
-hodge-podge of JavaScript snippets into a coherent code base.
559
+hodgepodge of JavaScript snippets into a coherent code base.
561560
562561
When deciding which features to port to JavaScript, the rules of thumb
563562
for this ongoing effort are:
564563
565564
- Pages which primarily display data (e.g. the timeline) will remain
566565
--- www/javascript.md
+++ www/javascript.md
@@ -46,20 +46,20 @@
46 [cg]: ./contribute.wiki
47
48
49 ## <a id="debate"></a>Arguments Against JavaScript & Our Rebuttals
50
51 There many common arguments against the use of JavaScript. Rather than
52 rehash these same arguments on the [forum][ffor], we distill the common
53 ones we’ve heard before and give our stock answers to them here:
54
55 1. “**It increases the size of the page download.**”
56
57 The heaviest such pages served by Fossil only have about 8 kB of
58 compressed JavaScript. (You have to go out of your way to get Fossil
59 to serve uncompressed pages.) This is negligible, even over very
60 slow data connnections. If you are still somehow on a 56 kbit/sec
61 analog telephone modem, this extra script code would download in
62 about a second.
63
64 Most JavaScript-based Fossil pages use less code than that.
65
@@ -223,11 +223,10 @@
223 The primary difference between these two for our purposes is that
224 NoScript lets you select scripts to run on a page on a case-by-case
225 basis, whereas uBlock Origin delegates those choices to a group of
226 motivated volunteers who maintain allow/block lists to control all
227 of this; you can then override UBO’s stock rules as needed.
228
229
230 10. “**My browser doesn’t even *have* a JavaScript interpreter.**”
231
232 The Fossil open source project has no full-time developers, and only
233 a few of these part-timers are responsible for the bulk of the code
@@ -555,11 +554,11 @@
555
556 As of mid-2020, the informal provisional plan is to increase Fossil
557 UI's use of JavaScript considerably compared to its historically minimal
558 uses. To that end, a framework of Fossil-centric APIs is being developed
559 in conjunction with new features to consolidate Fossil's historical
560 hodge-podge of JavaScript snippets into a coherent code base.
561
562 When deciding which features to port to JavaScript, the rules of thumb
563 for this ongoing effort are:
564
565 - Pages which primarily display data (e.g. the timeline) will remain
566
--- www/javascript.md
+++ www/javascript.md
@@ -46,20 +46,20 @@
46 [cg]: ./contribute.wiki
47
48
49 ## <a id="debate"></a>Arguments Against JavaScript & Our Rebuttals
50
51 There are many common arguments against the use of JavaScript. Rather than
52 rehash these same arguments on the [forum][ffor], we distill the common
53 ones we’ve heard before and give our stock answers to them here:
54
55 1. “**It increases the size of the page download.**”
56
57 The heaviest such pages served by Fossil only have about 8 kB of
58 compressed JavaScript. (You have to go out of your way to get Fossil
59 to serve uncompressed pages.) This is negligible, even over very
60 slow data connections. If you are still somehow on a 56 kbit/sec
61 analog telephone modem, this extra script code would download in
62 about a second.
63
64 Most JavaScript-based Fossil pages use less code than that.
65
@@ -223,11 +223,10 @@
223 The primary difference between these two for our purposes is that
224 NoScript lets you select scripts to run on a page on a case-by-case
225 basis, whereas uBlock Origin delegates those choices to a group of
226 motivated volunteers who maintain allow/block lists to control all
227 of this; you can then override UBO’s stock rules as needed.
 
228
229 10. “**My browser doesn’t even *have* a JavaScript interpreter.**”
230
231 The Fossil open source project has no full-time developers, and only
232 a few of these part-timers are responsible for the bulk of the code
@@ -555,11 +554,11 @@
554
555 As of mid-2020, the informal provisional plan is to increase Fossil
556 UI's use of JavaScript considerably compared to its historically minimal
557 uses. To that end, a framework of Fossil-centric APIs is being developed
558 in conjunction with new features to consolidate Fossil's historical
559 hodgepodge of JavaScript snippets into a coherent code base.
560
561 When deciding which features to port to JavaScript, the rules of thumb
562 for this ongoing effort are:
563
564 - Pages which primarily display data (e.g. the timeline) will remain
565

Keyboard Shortcuts

Open search /
Next entry (timeline) j
Previous entry (timeline) k
Open focused entry Enter
Show this help ?
Toggle theme Top nav button