Fossil SCM
Fix minor typo in the fossil-v-git document.
Commit
2e8f2887110925c06aec1cc7712fb98eff1163c33f9efb114033c1abfd7eaf71
Parent
805a58c320cc55c…
1 file changed
+1
-1
+1
-1
| --- www/fossil-v-git.wiki | ||
| +++ www/fossil-v-git.wiki | ||
| @@ -216,11 +216,11 @@ | ||
| 216 | 216 | Git is covered by the GPL license whereas Fossil is covered by |
| 217 | 217 | a two-clause BSD license. |
| 218 | 218 | |
| 219 | 219 | Consider the difference between GPL and BSD licenses: GPL is designed |
| 220 | 220 | to make writing easier at the expense of making reading harder. BSD is |
| 221 | -designed to make reading easier and the expense of making writing harder. | |
| 221 | +designed to make reading easier at the expense of making writing harder. | |
| 222 | 222 | |
| 223 | 223 | To a first approximation, the GPL license grants the right to read |
| 224 | 224 | source code to anyone who promises to give back enhancements. In other |
| 225 | 225 | words, the act of reading GPL source code (a prerequiste for making changes) |
| 226 | 226 | implies acceptance of the license which requires updates to be contributed |
| 227 | 227 |
| --- www/fossil-v-git.wiki | |
| +++ www/fossil-v-git.wiki | |
| @@ -216,11 +216,11 @@ | |
| 216 | Git is covered by the GPL license whereas Fossil is covered by |
| 217 | a two-clause BSD license. |
| 218 | |
| 219 | Consider the difference between GPL and BSD licenses: GPL is designed |
| 220 | to make writing easier at the expense of making reading harder. BSD is |
| 221 | designed to make reading easier and the expense of making writing harder. |
| 222 | |
| 223 | To a first approximation, the GPL license grants the right to read |
| 224 | source code to anyone who promises to give back enhancements. In other |
| 225 | words, the act of reading GPL source code (a prerequiste for making changes) |
| 226 | implies acceptance of the license which requires updates to be contributed |
| 227 |
| --- www/fossil-v-git.wiki | |
| +++ www/fossil-v-git.wiki | |
| @@ -216,11 +216,11 @@ | |
| 216 | Git is covered by the GPL license whereas Fossil is covered by |
| 217 | a two-clause BSD license. |
| 218 | |
| 219 | Consider the difference between GPL and BSD licenses: GPL is designed |
| 220 | to make writing easier at the expense of making reading harder. BSD is |
| 221 | designed to make reading easier at the expense of making writing harder. |
| 222 | |
| 223 | To a first approximation, the GPL license grants the right to read |
| 224 | source code to anyone who promises to give back enhancements. In other |
| 225 | words, the act of reading GPL source code (a prerequiste for making changes) |
| 226 | implies acceptance of the license which requires updates to be contributed |
| 227 |