Fossil SCM
If I am reading this correctly, the JPEG and PNG bars are the ones increasing with each commit, not so much the TIFF bar due to using uncompressed TIFF
Commit
309af345ab6ae43a62dfc2b4ee3c5917cde7b8c72b7b8e985e8821a5dbad5f89
Parent
fb6b093d9713506…
1 file changed
+1
-1
+1
-1
| --- www/image-format-vs-repo-size.md | ||
| +++ www/image-format-vs-repo-size.md | ||
| @@ -128,11 +128,11 @@ | ||
| 128 | 128 | checkins, and the repository growth rate is negligible past the |
| 129 | 129 | first commit.⁵ We owe this economy to Fossil’s delta compression |
| 130 | 130 | feature: it is encoding each of those single-pixel changes in a very |
| 131 | 131 | small amount of repository space. |
| 132 | 132 | |
| 133 | -* The JPEG and TIFF bars increase by large amounts on most checkins | |
| 133 | +* The JPEG and PNG bars increase by large amounts on most checkins | |
| 134 | 134 | even though each checkin *also* encodes only a *single-pixel change*. |
| 135 | 135 | |
| 136 | 136 | * The size of the first checkin in the BMP and TIFF cases is roughly |
| 137 | 137 | the same as that for the PNG case, because both PNG and Fossil use |
| 138 | 138 | the zlib binary data compression algorithm. This shows that for |
| 139 | 139 |
| --- www/image-format-vs-repo-size.md | |
| +++ www/image-format-vs-repo-size.md | |
| @@ -128,11 +128,11 @@ | |
| 128 | checkins, and the repository growth rate is negligible past the |
| 129 | first commit.⁵ We owe this economy to Fossil’s delta compression |
| 130 | feature: it is encoding each of those single-pixel changes in a very |
| 131 | small amount of repository space. |
| 132 | |
| 133 | * The JPEG and TIFF bars increase by large amounts on most checkins |
| 134 | even though each checkin *also* encodes only a *single-pixel change*. |
| 135 | |
| 136 | * The size of the first checkin in the BMP and TIFF cases is roughly |
| 137 | the same as that for the PNG case, because both PNG and Fossil use |
| 138 | the zlib binary data compression algorithm. This shows that for |
| 139 |
| --- www/image-format-vs-repo-size.md | |
| +++ www/image-format-vs-repo-size.md | |
| @@ -128,11 +128,11 @@ | |
| 128 | checkins, and the repository growth rate is negligible past the |
| 129 | first commit.⁵ We owe this economy to Fossil’s delta compression |
| 130 | feature: it is encoding each of those single-pixel changes in a very |
| 131 | small amount of repository space. |
| 132 | |
| 133 | * The JPEG and PNG bars increase by large amounts on most checkins |
| 134 | even though each checkin *also* encodes only a *single-pixel change*. |
| 135 | |
| 136 | * The size of the first checkin in the BMP and TIFF cases is roughly |
| 137 | the same as that for the PNG case, because both PNG and Fossil use |
| 138 | the zlib binary data compression algorithm. This shows that for |
| 139 |