Fossil SCM

Update the stats.wiki page with recent numbers.

drh 2018-06-04 02:43 trunk
Commit 6dc67e871e152f3a6234f2872408848fc6f9cd13b6dee386df740b08ee499b93
1 file changed +45 -45
+45 -45
--- www/stats.wiki
+++ www/stats.wiki
@@ -5,89 +5,89 @@
55
Does it use a lot of disk space or bandwidth? Is it scalable?
66
77
In an attempt to answers these questions, this report looks at several
88
projects that use fossil for configuration management and examines how
99
well they are working. The following table is a summary of the results.
10
-(Last updated on 2015-02-28.)
10
+(Last updated on 2018-06-04.)
1111
Explanation and analysis follows the table.
1212
1313
<table border=1>
1414
<tr>
1515
<th>Project</th>
1616
<th>Number Of Artifacts</th>
1717
<th>Number Of Check-ins</th>
18
-<th>Project&nbsp;Duration<br>(as of 2015-02-28)</th>
18
+<th>Project&nbsp;Duration<br>(as of 2018-06-04)</th>
1919
<th>Uncompressed Size</th>
2020
<th>Repository Size</th>
2121
<th>Compression Ratio</th>
2222
<th>Clone Bandwidth</th>
2323
</tr>
2424
2525
<tr align="center">
2626
<td>[http://www.sqlite.org/src/timeline | SQLite]
27
-<td>56089
28
-<td>14357
29
-<td>5388&nbsp;days<br>14.75&nbsp;years
30
-<td>3.4&nbsp;GB
31
-<td>45.5&nbsp;MB
32
-<td>73:1
33
-<td>29.9&nbsp;MB
27
+<td>77492
28
+<td>20686
29
+<td>6580&nbsp;days<br>18.02&nbsp;years
30
+<td>5.6&nbsp;GB
31
+<td>70.0&nbsp;MB
32
+<td>80:1
33
+<td>51.1&nbsp;MB
3434
</tr>
3535
3636
<tr align="center">
37
-<td>[http://core.tcl-lang.org/tcl/timeline | TCL]
38
-<td>139662
39
-<td>18125
40
-<td>6183&nbsp;days<br>16.93&nbsp;years
41
-<td>6.6&nbsp;GB
42
-<td>192.6&nbsp;MB
43
-<td>34:1
44
-<td>117.1&nbsp;MB
37
+<td>[http://core.tcl.tk/tcl/timeline | TCL]
38
+<td>161991
39
+<td>23146
40
+<td>7375&nbsp;days<br>20.19&nbsp;years
41
+<td>8.0&nbsp;GB
42
+<td>222.0&nbsp;MB
43
+<td>36:1
44
+<td>150.5&nbsp;MB
4545
</tr>
4646
4747
<tr align="center">
4848
<td>[/timeline | Fossil]
49
-<td>29937
50
-<td>8238
51
-<td>2779&nbsp;days<br>7.61&nbsp;years
52
-<td>2.3&nbsp;GB
53
-<td>34.0&nbsp;MB
54
-<td>67:1
55
-<td>21.5&nbsp;MB
49
+<td>39148
50
+<td>11266
51
+<td>3971&nbsp;days<br>10.87&nbsp;years
52
+<td>3.8&nbsp;GB
53
+<td>42.0&nbsp;MB
54
+<td>90:1
55
+<td>27.4&nbsp;MB
5656
</tr>
5757
5858
<tr align="center">
5959
<td>[http://www.sqlite.org/slt/timeline | SLT]
60
-<td>2278
61
-<td>136
62
-<td>2282&nbsp;days<br>6.25&nbsp;years
63
-<td>2.0&nbsp;GB
64
-<td>144.7&nbsp;MB
65
-<td>13:1
66
-<td>142.1&nbsp;MB
60
+<td>2384
61
+<td>169
62
+<td>3474&nbsp;days<br>9.51&nbsp;years
63
+<td>2.1&nbsp;GB
64
+<td>145.9&nbsp;MB
65
+<td>14:1
66
+<td>143.4&nbsp;MB
6767
</tr>
6868
6969
<tr align="center">
7070
<td>[http://www.sqlite.org/th3.html | TH3]
71
-<td>8729
72
-<td>2406
73
-<td>2347&nbsp;days<br>6.43&nbsp;years
74
-<td>386&nbsp;MB
75
-<td>15.2&nbsp;MB
76
-<td>25:1
77
-<td>12.6&nbsp;MB
71
+<td>12406
72
+<td>3718
73
+<td>3539&nbsp;days<br>9.69&nbsp;years
74
+<td>544&nbsp;MB
75
+<td>18.0&nbsp;MB
76
+<td>30:1
77
+<td>14.7&nbsp;MB
7878
</tr>
7979
8080
<tr align="center">
8181
<td>[http://www.sqlite.org/docsrc/timeline | SQLite Docs]
82
-<td>5503
83
-<td>1631
84
-<td>2666&nbsp;days<br>7.30&nbsp;years
85
-<td>194&nbsp;MB
86
-<td>10.9&nbsp;MB
87
-<td>17:1
88
-<td>8.37&nbsp;MB
82
+<td>8752
83
+<td>2783
84
+<td>3857&nbsp;days<br>10.56&nbsp;years
85
+<td>349.9&nbsp;MB
86
+<td>16.3&nbsp;MB
87
+<td>21:1
88
+<td>13.57&nbsp;MB
8989
</tr>
9090
9191
</table>
9292
9393
<h2>Measured Attributes</h2>
9494
--- www/stats.wiki
+++ www/stats.wiki
@@ -5,89 +5,89 @@
5 Does it use a lot of disk space or bandwidth? Is it scalable?
6
7 In an attempt to answers these questions, this report looks at several
8 projects that use fossil for configuration management and examines how
9 well they are working. The following table is a summary of the results.
10 (Last updated on 2015-02-28.)
11 Explanation and analysis follows the table.
12
13 <table border=1>
14 <tr>
15 <th>Project</th>
16 <th>Number Of Artifacts</th>
17 <th>Number Of Check-ins</th>
18 <th>Project&nbsp;Duration<br>(as of 2015-02-28)</th>
19 <th>Uncompressed Size</th>
20 <th>Repository Size</th>
21 <th>Compression Ratio</th>
22 <th>Clone Bandwidth</th>
23 </tr>
24
25 <tr align="center">
26 <td>[http://www.sqlite.org/src/timeline | SQLite]
27 <td>56089
28 <td>14357
29 <td>5388&nbsp;days<br>14.75&nbsp;years
30 <td>3.4&nbsp;GB
31 <td>45.5&nbsp;MB
32 <td>73:1
33 <td>29.9&nbsp;MB
34 </tr>
35
36 <tr align="center">
37 <td>[http://core.tcl-lang.org/tcl/timeline | TCL]
38 <td>139662
39 <td>18125
40 <td>6183&nbsp;days<br>16.93&nbsp;years
41 <td>6.6&nbsp;GB
42 <td>192.6&nbsp;MB
43 <td>34:1
44 <td>117.1&nbsp;MB
45 </tr>
46
47 <tr align="center">
48 <td>[/timeline | Fossil]
49 <td>29937
50 <td>8238
51 <td>2779&nbsp;days<br>7.61&nbsp;years
52 <td>2.3&nbsp;GB
53 <td>34.0&nbsp;MB
54 <td>67:1
55 <td>21.5&nbsp;MB
56 </tr>
57
58 <tr align="center">
59 <td>[http://www.sqlite.org/slt/timeline | SLT]
60 <td>2278
61 <td>136
62 <td>2282&nbsp;days<br>6.25&nbsp;years
63 <td>2.0&nbsp;GB
64 <td>144.7&nbsp;MB
65 <td>13:1
66 <td>142.1&nbsp;MB
67 </tr>
68
69 <tr align="center">
70 <td>[http://www.sqlite.org/th3.html | TH3]
71 <td>8729
72 <td>2406
73 <td>2347&nbsp;days<br>6.43&nbsp;years
74 <td>386&nbsp;MB
75 <td>15.2&nbsp;MB
76 <td>25:1
77 <td>12.6&nbsp;MB
78 </tr>
79
80 <tr align="center">
81 <td>[http://www.sqlite.org/docsrc/timeline | SQLite Docs]
82 <td>5503
83 <td>1631
84 <td>2666&nbsp;days<br>7.30&nbsp;years
85 <td>194&nbsp;MB
86 <td>10.9&nbsp;MB
87 <td>17:1
88 <td>8.37&nbsp;MB
89 </tr>
90
91 </table>
92
93 <h2>Measured Attributes</h2>
94
--- www/stats.wiki
+++ www/stats.wiki
@@ -5,89 +5,89 @@
5 Does it use a lot of disk space or bandwidth? Is it scalable?
6
7 In an attempt to answers these questions, this report looks at several
8 projects that use fossil for configuration management and examines how
9 well they are working. The following table is a summary of the results.
10 (Last updated on 2018-06-04.)
11 Explanation and analysis follows the table.
12
13 <table border=1>
14 <tr>
15 <th>Project</th>
16 <th>Number Of Artifacts</th>
17 <th>Number Of Check-ins</th>
18 <th>Project&nbsp;Duration<br>(as of 2018-06-04)</th>
19 <th>Uncompressed Size</th>
20 <th>Repository Size</th>
21 <th>Compression Ratio</th>
22 <th>Clone Bandwidth</th>
23 </tr>
24
25 <tr align="center">
26 <td>[http://www.sqlite.org/src/timeline | SQLite]
27 <td>77492
28 <td>20686
29 <td>6580&nbsp;days<br>18.02&nbsp;years
30 <td>5.6&nbsp;GB
31 <td>70.0&nbsp;MB
32 <td>80:1
33 <td>51.1&nbsp;MB
34 </tr>
35
36 <tr align="center">
37 <td>[http://core.tcl.tk/tcl/timeline | TCL]
38 <td>161991
39 <td>23146
40 <td>7375&nbsp;days<br>20.19&nbsp;years
41 <td>8.0&nbsp;GB
42 <td>222.0&nbsp;MB
43 <td>36:1
44 <td>150.5&nbsp;MB
45 </tr>
46
47 <tr align="center">
48 <td>[/timeline | Fossil]
49 <td>39148
50 <td>11266
51 <td>3971&nbsp;days<br>10.87&nbsp;years
52 <td>3.8&nbsp;GB
53 <td>42.0&nbsp;MB
54 <td>90:1
55 <td>27.4&nbsp;MB
56 </tr>
57
58 <tr align="center">
59 <td>[http://www.sqlite.org/slt/timeline | SLT]
60 <td>2384
61 <td>169
62 <td>3474&nbsp;days<br>9.51&nbsp;years
63 <td>2.1&nbsp;GB
64 <td>145.9&nbsp;MB
65 <td>14:1
66 <td>143.4&nbsp;MB
67 </tr>
68
69 <tr align="center">
70 <td>[http://www.sqlite.org/th3.html | TH3]
71 <td>12406
72 <td>3718
73 <td>3539&nbsp;days<br>9.69&nbsp;years
74 <td>544&nbsp;MB
75 <td>18.0&nbsp;MB
76 <td>30:1
77 <td>14.7&nbsp;MB
78 </tr>
79
80 <tr align="center">
81 <td>[http://www.sqlite.org/docsrc/timeline | SQLite Docs]
82 <td>8752
83 <td>2783
84 <td>3857&nbsp;days<br>10.56&nbsp;years
85 <td>349.9&nbsp;MB
86 <td>16.3&nbsp;MB
87 <td>21:1
88 <td>13.57&nbsp;MB
89 </tr>
90
91 </table>
92
93 <h2>Measured Attributes</h2>
94

Keyboard Shortcuts

Open search /
Next entry (timeline) j
Previous entry (timeline) k
Open focused entry Enter
Show this help ?
Toggle theme Top nav button