Fossil SCM

Clarity pass on the autosync section of the gitusers doc

wyoung 2023-05-12 13:32 trunk
Commit 80963ffeda3650dfe95f8c18adf3f5871cd9b20eaae26d9ed13481bdacb06304
1 file changed +17 -20
+17 -20
--- www/gitusers.md
+++ www/gitusers.md
@@ -602,38 +602,35 @@
602602
focus on the fact that you’ve made it easier for [forks] to occur in the
603603
development history by disabling autosync. If all three machines were
604604
online and syncing at the time the sequence above began, Bob would
605605
have been warned in step 2 that committing to the central repo would
606606
create a fork and would be invited to fix it before committing.
607
-Likewise, Alice would be warned about the new tip-of-branch commit the
608
-next time she triggered an implicit autosync at step 3.
607
+Likewise, Alice will be warned about the new tip-of-branch commit the
608
+next time she triggers an implicit autosync at step 3, bringing Bob’s
609
+changes down in a non-conflicting manner, allowing work to proceed
610
+without fuss.
611
+
612
+Another way the above scenario could go down is that by the next time
613
+Alice does something to trigger an autosync, she’s done something in the
614
+meantime to create *another* fork. Alice is then invited to fix the
615
+second fork in the same manner as Bob was, getting both parties back
616
+onto a single track as expeditiously as possible, requiring no direct
617
+communication. This moves the synchronization point out of the
618
+expensive human-time workflow and into the software system, where it’s
619
+cheapest to resolve.
609620
610621
Solving this class of problem in as automated a manner as is possible is
611
-why autosync is enabled by default. It provides Fossil with most of the
612
-advantages of a centralized version control system while retaining the
613
-advantages of distributed version control.
614
-
615
-With autosync enabled, Fossil will warn Bob in step 2 above that his
616
-commit to the shared working branch will create a fork; he could force
617
-it, but he is instead invited to fix the fork before committing. When
618
-Alice then does something to trigger an autosync, if she hasn’t done
619
-anything in the meantime to create *another* fork, Bob’s changes come
620
-down in a non-conflicting manner and work proceeds without fuss.
621
-Otherwise, Alice is invited to fix the second fork in the same manner,
622
-getting both parties back onto a single track as expeditiously as
623
-possible, requiring no direct communication. This moves the
624
-synchronization point out of the expensive human-time workflow and into
625
-the software system, where it’s cheapest to resolve.
626
-
627
-The advantages of autosync are:
622
+why Fossil enables autosync by default. It provides Fossil with most of
623
+the advantages of a centralized version control system while retaining
624
+the advantages of distributed version control. With autosync enabled:
628625
629626
1. Your work stays synced up with your coworkers’ efforts as long as your
630627
machine can connect to the remote repository. At need, you can go
631628
off-network and continue work atop the last version you synced with
632629
the remote.
633630
634
-2. It provides immediate off-machine backup of your commits. Unlike
631
+2. You get implicit off-machine backup of your commits. Unlike
635632
centralized version control, though, you can still work while
636633
disconnected; your changes will sync up with the remote once you get
637634
back online.
638635
639636
3. Because there is [little distinction][bu] between the clones in the Fossil
640637
--- www/gitusers.md
+++ www/gitusers.md
@@ -602,38 +602,35 @@
602 focus on the fact that you’ve made it easier for [forks] to occur in the
603 development history by disabling autosync. If all three machines were
604 online and syncing at the time the sequence above began, Bob would
605 have been warned in step 2 that committing to the central repo would
606 create a fork and would be invited to fix it before committing.
607 Likewise, Alice would be warned about the new tip-of-branch commit the
608 next time she triggered an implicit autosync at step 3.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
609
610 Solving this class of problem in as automated a manner as is possible is
611 why autosync is enabled by default. It provides Fossil with most of the
612 advantages of a centralized version control system while retaining the
613 advantages of distributed version control.
614
615 With autosync enabled, Fossil will warn Bob in step 2 above that his
616 commit to the shared working branch will create a fork; he could force
617 it, but he is instead invited to fix the fork before committing. When
618 Alice then does something to trigger an autosync, if she hasn’t done
619 anything in the meantime to create *another* fork, Bob’s changes come
620 down in a non-conflicting manner and work proceeds without fuss.
621 Otherwise, Alice is invited to fix the second fork in the same manner,
622 getting both parties back onto a single track as expeditiously as
623 possible, requiring no direct communication. This moves the
624 synchronization point out of the expensive human-time workflow and into
625 the software system, where it’s cheapest to resolve.
626
627 The advantages of autosync are:
628
629 1. Your work stays synced up with your coworkers’ efforts as long as your
630 machine can connect to the remote repository. At need, you can go
631 off-network and continue work atop the last version you synced with
632 the remote.
633
634 2. It provides immediate off-machine backup of your commits. Unlike
635 centralized version control, though, you can still work while
636 disconnected; your changes will sync up with the remote once you get
637 back online.
638
639 3. Because there is [little distinction][bu] between the clones in the Fossil
640
--- www/gitusers.md
+++ www/gitusers.md
@@ -602,38 +602,35 @@
602 focus on the fact that you’ve made it easier for [forks] to occur in the
603 development history by disabling autosync. If all three machines were
604 online and syncing at the time the sequence above began, Bob would
605 have been warned in step 2 that committing to the central repo would
606 create a fork and would be invited to fix it before committing.
607 Likewise, Alice will be warned about the new tip-of-branch commit the
608 next time she triggers an implicit autosync at step 3, bringing Bob’s
609 changes down in a non-conflicting manner, allowing work to proceed
610 without fuss.
611
612 Another way the above scenario could go down is that by the next time
613 Alice does something to trigger an autosync, she’s done something in the
614 meantime to create *another* fork. Alice is then invited to fix the
615 second fork in the same manner as Bob was, getting both parties back
616 onto a single track as expeditiously as possible, requiring no direct
617 communication. This moves the synchronization point out of the
618 expensive human-time workflow and into the software system, where it’s
619 cheapest to resolve.
620
621 Solving this class of problem in as automated a manner as is possible is
622 why Fossil enables autosync by default. It provides Fossil with most of
623 the advantages of a centralized version control system while retaining
624 the advantages of distributed version control. With autosync enabled:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
625
626 1. Your work stays synced up with your coworkers’ efforts as long as your
627 machine can connect to the remote repository. At need, you can go
628 off-network and continue work atop the last version you synced with
629 the remote.
630
631 2. You get implicit off-machine backup of your commits. Unlike
632 centralized version control, though, you can still work while
633 disconnected; your changes will sync up with the remote once you get
634 back online.
635
636 3. Because there is [little distinction][bu] between the clones in the Fossil
637

Keyboard Shortcuts

Open search /
Next entry (timeline) j
Previous entry (timeline) k
Open focused entry Enter
Show this help ?
Toggle theme Top nav button