Fossil SCM

Attempt to use the feature added in [e32214a409] to extract the duplicate Pikchr code for diagram #4 in the rebase doc as a separate file, so we can refer to it twice via a Markdown image link instead. Doesn't work, but my next steps require a checkin I can reference.

wyoung 2020-10-11 07:03 trunk
Commit a9dcda5dfdbca29defe785730d6f2dc55a30777fc45fae078c09b4c0fdeb06c3
--- a/www/rebase04.pikchr
+++ b/www/rebase04.pikchr
@@ -0,0 +1,26 @@
1
+# Commit diagram referenced twice from rebaseharm.md, so we keep it
2
+# external, to avoid duplicate inline code.
3
+
4
+scale = 0.8
5
+circle "C0" fit fill white
6
+arrow right 50%
7
+circle same "C1"
8
+arrow same
9
+circle same "C2"
10
+arrow same
11
+circle same "C4"
12
+arrow same
13
+circle same "C6"
14
+circle same "C3" at last arrow.width + C0.rad*2 heading 30 from C2
15
+arrow right 50%
16
+circle same "C5"
17
+arrow from C2 to C3 chop
18
+C3P: circle same "C3'" at first arrow.width + C0.rad*2 heading 30 from C6
19
+arrow right 50% from C3P.e
20
+C5P: circle same "C5'"
21
+arrow from C6 to C3P chop
22
+
23
+box ht C3.y-C2.y wid C5P.e.x-C0.w.x+1.5*C1.rad with .w at 0.5*(first arrow.wid) west of C0.w \
24
+ behind C0 fill 0xc6e2ff color 0xaac5df
25
+box ht previous.ht wid previous.e.x - C2.w.x with .se at previous.ne \
26
+ behind C0 fill 0x9accfc color 0xaac5df
--- a/www/rebase04.pikchr
+++ b/www/rebase04.pikchr
@@ -0,0 +1,26 @@
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
--- a/www/rebase04.pikchr
+++ b/www/rebase04.pikchr
@@ -0,0 +1,26 @@
1 # Commit diagram referenced twice from rebaseharm.md, so we keep it
2 # external, to avoid duplicate inline code.
3
4 scale = 0.8
5 circle "C0" fit fill white
6 arrow right 50%
7 circle same "C1"
8 arrow same
9 circle same "C2"
10 arrow same
11 circle same "C4"
12 arrow same
13 circle same "C6"
14 circle same "C3" at last arrow.width + C0.rad*2 heading 30 from C2
15 arrow right 50%
16 circle same "C5"
17 arrow from C2 to C3 chop
18 C3P: circle same "C3'" at first arrow.width + C0.rad*2 heading 30 from C6
19 arrow right 50% from C3P.e
20 C5P: circle same "C5'"
21 arrow from C6 to C3P chop
22
23 box ht C3.y-C2.y wid C5P.e.x-C0.w.x+1.5*C1.rad with .w at 0.5*(first arrow.wid) west of C0.w \
24 behind C0 fill 0xc6e2ff color 0xaac5df
25 box ht previous.ht wid previous.e.x - C2.w.x with .se at previous.ne \
26 behind C0 fill 0x9accfc color 0xaac5df
--- www/rebaseharm.md
+++ www/rebaseharm.md
@@ -123,36 +123,13 @@
123123
run concurrently with the main line in check-ins C4 and C6. Advocates
124124
for rebase say that you should rebase the feature branch to the tip
125125
of main in order to remove main-line development differences from
126126
the feature branch's history:
127127
128
-~~~ pikchr toggle
129
-# Duplicated below in section 5.0
130
-scale = 0.8
131
-circle "C0" fit fill white
132
-arrow right 50%
133
-circle same "C1"
134
-arrow same
135
-circle same "C2"
136
-arrow same
137
-circle same "C4"
138
-arrow same
139
-circle same "C6"
140
-circle same "C3" at last arrow.width + C0.rad*2 heading 30 from C2
141
-arrow right 50%
142
-circle same "C5"
143
-arrow from C2 to C3 chop
144
-C3P: circle same "C3'" at first arrow.width + C0.rad*2 heading 30 from C6
145
-arrow right 50% from C3P.e
146
-C5P: circle same "C5'"
147
-arrow from C6 to C3P chop
148
-
149
-box ht C3.y-C2.y wid C5P.e.x-C0.w.x+1.5*C1.rad with .w at 0.5*(first arrow.wid) west of C0.w \
150
- behind C0 fill 0xc6e2ff color 0xaac5df
151
-box ht previous.ht wid previous.e.x - C2.w.x with .se at previous.ne \
152
- behind C0 fill 0x9accfc color 0xaac5df
153
-~~~
128
+![rebase diagram][4]
129
+
130
+[4]: ./rebase04.pikchr
154131
155132
156133
You could choose to collapse C3\' and C5\' into a single check-in
157134
as part of this rebase, but that's a side issue we'll deal with
158135
[separately](#collapsing).
@@ -255,36 +232,11 @@
255232
256233
## <a name="timestamps"></a>4.0 Rebase causes timestamp confusion
257234
258235
Consider the earlier example of rebasing a feature branch:
259236
260
-~~~ pikchr toggle
261
-# Copy of second diagram in section 2.2 above
262
-scale = 0.8
263
-circle "C0" fit fill white
264
-arrow right 50%
265
-circle same "C1"
266
-arrow same
267
-circle same "C2"
268
-arrow same
269
-circle same "C4"
270
-arrow same
271
-circle same "C6"
272
-circle same "C3" at last arrow.width + C0.rad*2 heading 30 from C2
273
-arrow right 50%
274
-circle same "C5"
275
-arrow from C2 to C3 chop
276
-C3P: circle same "C3'" at first arrow.width + C0.rad*2 heading 30 from C6
277
-arrow right 50% from C3P.e
278
-C5P: circle same "C5'"
279
-arrow from C6 to C3P chop
280
-
281
-box ht C3.y-C2.y wid C5P.e.x-C0.w.x+1.5*C1.rad with .w at 0.5*(first arrow.wid) west of C0.w \
282
- behind C0 fill 0xc6e2ff color 0xaac5df
283
-box ht previous.ht wid previous.e.x - C2.w.x with .se at previous.ne \
284
- behind C0 fill 0x9accfc color 0xaac5df
285
-~~~
237
+![rebase diagram from section 2.2 again][4]
286238
287239
What timestamps go on the C3\' and C5\' check-ins? If you choose
288240
the same timestamps as the original C3 and C5, then you have the
289241
odd situation C3' is older than its parent C6. We call that a
290242
"timewarp" in Fossil. Timewarps can also happen due to misconfigured
291243
--- www/rebaseharm.md
+++ www/rebaseharm.md
@@ -123,36 +123,13 @@
123 run concurrently with the main line in check-ins C4 and C6. Advocates
124 for rebase say that you should rebase the feature branch to the tip
125 of main in order to remove main-line development differences from
126 the feature branch's history:
127
128 ~~~ pikchr toggle
129 # Duplicated below in section 5.0
130 scale = 0.8
131 circle "C0" fit fill white
132 arrow right 50%
133 circle same "C1"
134 arrow same
135 circle same "C2"
136 arrow same
137 circle same "C4"
138 arrow same
139 circle same "C6"
140 circle same "C3" at last arrow.width + C0.rad*2 heading 30 from C2
141 arrow right 50%
142 circle same "C5"
143 arrow from C2 to C3 chop
144 C3P: circle same "C3'" at first arrow.width + C0.rad*2 heading 30 from C6
145 arrow right 50% from C3P.e
146 C5P: circle same "C5'"
147 arrow from C6 to C3P chop
148
149 box ht C3.y-C2.y wid C5P.e.x-C0.w.x+1.5*C1.rad with .w at 0.5*(first arrow.wid) west of C0.w \
150 behind C0 fill 0xc6e2ff color 0xaac5df
151 box ht previous.ht wid previous.e.x - C2.w.x with .se at previous.ne \
152 behind C0 fill 0x9accfc color 0xaac5df
153 ~~~
154
155
156 You could choose to collapse C3\' and C5\' into a single check-in
157 as part of this rebase, but that's a side issue we'll deal with
158 [separately](#collapsing).
@@ -255,36 +232,11 @@
255
256 ## <a name="timestamps"></a>4.0 Rebase causes timestamp confusion
257
258 Consider the earlier example of rebasing a feature branch:
259
260 ~~~ pikchr toggle
261 # Copy of second diagram in section 2.2 above
262 scale = 0.8
263 circle "C0" fit fill white
264 arrow right 50%
265 circle same "C1"
266 arrow same
267 circle same "C2"
268 arrow same
269 circle same "C4"
270 arrow same
271 circle same "C6"
272 circle same "C3" at last arrow.width + C0.rad*2 heading 30 from C2
273 arrow right 50%
274 circle same "C5"
275 arrow from C2 to C3 chop
276 C3P: circle same "C3'" at first arrow.width + C0.rad*2 heading 30 from C6
277 arrow right 50% from C3P.e
278 C5P: circle same "C5'"
279 arrow from C6 to C3P chop
280
281 box ht C3.y-C2.y wid C5P.e.x-C0.w.x+1.5*C1.rad with .w at 0.5*(first arrow.wid) west of C0.w \
282 behind C0 fill 0xc6e2ff color 0xaac5df
283 box ht previous.ht wid previous.e.x - C2.w.x with .se at previous.ne \
284 behind C0 fill 0x9accfc color 0xaac5df
285 ~~~
286
287 What timestamps go on the C3\' and C5\' check-ins? If you choose
288 the same timestamps as the original C3 and C5, then you have the
289 odd situation C3' is older than its parent C6. We call that a
290 "timewarp" in Fossil. Timewarps can also happen due to misconfigured
291
--- www/rebaseharm.md
+++ www/rebaseharm.md
@@ -123,36 +123,13 @@
123 run concurrently with the main line in check-ins C4 and C6. Advocates
124 for rebase say that you should rebase the feature branch to the tip
125 of main in order to remove main-line development differences from
126 the feature branch's history:
127
128 ![rebase diagram][4]
129
130 [4]: ./rebase04.pikchr
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
131
132
133 You could choose to collapse C3\' and C5\' into a single check-in
134 as part of this rebase, but that's a side issue we'll deal with
135 [separately](#collapsing).
@@ -255,36 +232,11 @@
232
233 ## <a name="timestamps"></a>4.0 Rebase causes timestamp confusion
234
235 Consider the earlier example of rebasing a feature branch:
236
237 ![rebase diagram from section 2.2 again][4]
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
238
239 What timestamps go on the C3\' and C5\' check-ins? If you choose
240 the same timestamps as the original C3 and C5, then you have the
241 odd situation C3' is older than its parent C6. We call that a
242 "timewarp" in Fossil. Timewarps can also happen due to misconfigured
243

Keyboard Shortcuts

Open search /
Next entry (timeline) j
Previous entry (timeline) k
Open focused entry Enter
Show this help ?
Toggle theme Top nav button