Fossil SCM

Update secondary mention of SQLite compression ratio to match table

andygoth 2018-06-09 16:37 trunk
Commit b46141f4581dbf3ad51f2460167604f4a27983513d414bc1d2c00a63048992cb
1 file changed +1 -1
+1 -1
--- www/stats.wiki
+++ www/stats.wiki
@@ -129,11 +129,11 @@
129129
130130
Perhaps the two most interesting datapoints in the above table are SQLite
131131
and SLT. SQLite is a long-running project with long revision chains.
132132
Some of the files in SQLite have been edited over a thousand times.
133133
Each of these edits is stored as a delta, and hence the SQLite project
134
-gets excellent 73:1 compression. SLT, on the other hand, consists of
134
+gets excellent 80:1 compression. SLT, on the other hand, consists of
135135
many large (megabyte-sized) SQL scripts that have one or maybe two
136136
edits each. There is very little delta compression occurring and so the
137137
overall repository compression ratio is much lower. Note also that
138138
quite a bit more bandwidth is required to clone SLT than SQLite.
139139
140140
--- www/stats.wiki
+++ www/stats.wiki
@@ -129,11 +129,11 @@
129
130 Perhaps the two most interesting datapoints in the above table are SQLite
131 and SLT. SQLite is a long-running project with long revision chains.
132 Some of the files in SQLite have been edited over a thousand times.
133 Each of these edits is stored as a delta, and hence the SQLite project
134 gets excellent 73:1 compression. SLT, on the other hand, consists of
135 many large (megabyte-sized) SQL scripts that have one or maybe two
136 edits each. There is very little delta compression occurring and so the
137 overall repository compression ratio is much lower. Note also that
138 quite a bit more bandwidth is required to clone SLT than SQLite.
139
140
--- www/stats.wiki
+++ www/stats.wiki
@@ -129,11 +129,11 @@
129
130 Perhaps the two most interesting datapoints in the above table are SQLite
131 and SLT. SQLite is a long-running project with long revision chains.
132 Some of the files in SQLite have been edited over a thousand times.
133 Each of these edits is stored as a delta, and hence the SQLite project
134 gets excellent 80:1 compression. SLT, on the other hand, consists of
135 many large (megabyte-sized) SQL scripts that have one or maybe two
136 edits each. There is very little delta compression occurring and so the
137 overall repository compression ratio is much lower. Note also that
138 quite a bit more bandwidth is required to clone SLT than SQLite.
139
140

Keyboard Shortcuts

Open search /
Next entry (timeline) j
Previous entry (timeline) k
Open focused entry Enter
Show this help ?
Toggle theme Top nav button