Fossil SCM

More documentation updates to highlight recent changes.

drh 2019-05-11 01:42 trunk
Commit bcea5291cee5f9f4a70d52ec9e6314c16e85c54809baeaa8214e4485acb18b96
--- src/markdown.md
+++ src/markdown.md
@@ -58,10 +58,11 @@
5858
>
5959
* bullet item
6060
+ bullet item
6161
- bullet item
6262
1. numbered item
63
+ 2) numbered item
6364
6465
> A two-level list is created by placing additional whitespace before the
6566
> **\***/**+**/**-**/**1.** of the secondary items.
6667
6768
>
6869
--- src/markdown.md
+++ src/markdown.md
@@ -58,10 +58,11 @@
58 >
59 * bullet item
60 + bullet item
61 - bullet item
62 1. numbered item
 
63
64 > A two-level list is created by placing additional whitespace before the
65 > **\***/**+**/**-**/**1.** of the secondary items.
66
67 >
68
--- src/markdown.md
+++ src/markdown.md
@@ -58,10 +58,11 @@
58 >
59 * bullet item
60 + bullet item
61 - bullet item
62 1. numbered item
63 2) numbered item
64
65 > A two-level list is created by placing additional whitespace before the
66 > **\***/**+**/**-**/**1.** of the secondary items.
67
68 >
69
--- www/checkin_names.wiki
+++ www/checkin_names.wiki
@@ -142,21 +142,27 @@
142142
<h2>Timestamps</h2>
143143
144144
A timestamp in one of the formats shown below means the most recent
145145
check-in that occurs no later than the timestamp given:
146146
147
- * <i>YYYY-MM-DD</i>
148
- * <i>YYYY-MM-DD HH:MM</i>
149
- * <i>YYYY-MM-DD HH:MM:SS</i>
150
- * <i>YYYY-MM-DD HH:MM:SS.SSS</i>
147
+ 1. <i>YYYY-MM-DD</i>
148
+ 2. <i>YYYY-MM-DD HH:MM</i>
149
+ 3. <i>YYYY-MM-DD HH:MM:SS</i>
150
+ 4. <i>YYYY-MM-DD HH:MM:SS.SSS</i>
151
+ 5. <i>YYYYMMDD</i>
152
+ 6. <i>YYYYMMDDHHMM</i>
153
+ 7. <i>YYYYMMDDHHMMSS</i>
151154
152
-The space between the day and the year can optionally be
155
+In the second through the fourth forms,
156
+the space between the day and the year can optionally be
153157
replaced by an uppercase <b>T</b> and the entire timestamp can
154158
optionally be followed by "<b>z</b>" or "<b>Z</b>". In the fourth
155159
form with fractional seconds, any number of digits may follow the
156160
decimal point, though due to precision limits only the first three
157
-digits will be significant.
161
+digits will be significant. The final three pure-digit forms
162
+without punctuation are only valid if the number they encode is
163
+not also the prefix of an artifact hash.
158164
159165
In its default configuration, Fossil interprets and displays all dates
160166
in Universal Coordinated Time (UTC). This tends to work the best for
161167
distributed projects where participants are scattered around the globe.
162168
But there is an option on the Admin/Timeline page of the web-interface to
163169
--- www/checkin_names.wiki
+++ www/checkin_names.wiki
@@ -142,21 +142,27 @@
142 <h2>Timestamps</h2>
143
144 A timestamp in one of the formats shown below means the most recent
145 check-in that occurs no later than the timestamp given:
146
147 * <i>YYYY-MM-DD</i>
148 * <i>YYYY-MM-DD HH:MM</i>
149 * <i>YYYY-MM-DD HH:MM:SS</i>
150 * <i>YYYY-MM-DD HH:MM:SS.SSS</i>
 
 
 
151
152 The space between the day and the year can optionally be
 
153 replaced by an uppercase <b>T</b> and the entire timestamp can
154 optionally be followed by "<b>z</b>" or "<b>Z</b>". In the fourth
155 form with fractional seconds, any number of digits may follow the
156 decimal point, though due to precision limits only the first three
157 digits will be significant.
 
 
158
159 In its default configuration, Fossil interprets and displays all dates
160 in Universal Coordinated Time (UTC). This tends to work the best for
161 distributed projects where participants are scattered around the globe.
162 But there is an option on the Admin/Timeline page of the web-interface to
163
--- www/checkin_names.wiki
+++ www/checkin_names.wiki
@@ -142,21 +142,27 @@
142 <h2>Timestamps</h2>
143
144 A timestamp in one of the formats shown below means the most recent
145 check-in that occurs no later than the timestamp given:
146
147 1. <i>YYYY-MM-DD</i>
148 2. <i>YYYY-MM-DD HH:MM</i>
149 3. <i>YYYY-MM-DD HH:MM:SS</i>
150 4. <i>YYYY-MM-DD HH:MM:SS.SSS</i>
151 5. <i>YYYYMMDD</i>
152 6. <i>YYYYMMDDHHMM</i>
153 7. <i>YYYYMMDDHHMMSS</i>
154
155 In the second through the fourth forms,
156 the space between the day and the year can optionally be
157 replaced by an uppercase <b>T</b> and the entire timestamp can
158 optionally be followed by "<b>z</b>" or "<b>Z</b>". In the fourth
159 form with fractional seconds, any number of digits may follow the
160 decimal point, though due to precision limits only the first three
161 digits will be significant. The final three pure-digit forms
162 without punctuation are only valid if the number they encode is
163 not also the prefix of an artifact hash.
164
165 In its default configuration, Fossil interprets and displays all dates
166 in Universal Coordinated Time (UTC). This tends to work the best for
167 distributed projects where participants are scattered around the globe.
168 But there is an option on the Admin/Timeline page of the web-interface to
169
--- www/fossil-v-git.wiki
+++ www/fossil-v-git.wiki
@@ -25,16 +25,18 @@
2525
with further description in the text that follows.
2626
2727
<blockquote><table border=1 cellpadding=5 align=center>
2828
<tr><th width="50%">GIT</th><th width="50%">FOSSIL</th></tr>
2929
<tr><td>File versioning only</td>
30
- <td>Versioning, Tickets, Wiki, and Technotes</td></tr>
30
+ <td>Versioning, Tickets, Wiki, Technotes, Forum</td></tr>
3131
<tr><td>Ad-hoc, pile-of-files key/value database</td>
3232
<td>Relational SQL database</td></tr>
3333
<tr><td>Bazaar-style development</td><td>Cathedral-style development</td></tr>
3434
<tr><td>Designed for Linux development</td>
3535
<td>Designed for SQLite development</td></tr>
36
+<tr><td>Focus on individual branches</td>
37
+ <td>Focus on the entire tree of changes</td></tr>
3638
<tr><td>Lots of little tools</td><td>Stand-alone executable</td></tr>
3739
<tr><td>One check-out per repository</td>
3840
<td>Many check-outs per repository</td></tr>
3941
<tr><td>Remembers what you should have done</td>
4042
<td>Remembers what you actually did</td></tr>
@@ -44,12 +46,12 @@
4446
<h3>2.1 Feature Set</h3>
4547
4648
Git provides file versioning services only, whereas Fossil adds
4749
integrated [./wikitheory.wiki | wiki],
4850
[./bugtheory.wiki | ticketing &amp; bug tracking],
49
-[./embeddeddoc.wiki | embedded documentation], and
50
-[./event.wiki | Technical notes].
51
+[./embeddeddoc.wiki | embedded documentation],
52
+[./event.wiki | Technical notes], and a [./forum.wiki | forum].
5153
These additional capabilities are available for Git as 3rd-party and/or
5254
user-installed add-ons, but with Fossil they are integrated into
5355
the design. One way to describe Fossil is that it is
5456
"[https://github.com/ | github]-in-a-box".
5557
@@ -159,11 +161,39 @@
159161
SQLite uses cathedral-style development. 95% of the code in SQLite
160162
comes from just three programmers, 64% from just the lead developer.
161163
And all SQLite developers know each other well and interact daily.
162164
Fossil is designed for this development model.
163165
164
-<h3>2.5 Lots of little tools vs. Self-contained system</h3>
166
+<h3>2.5 Individual Branches vs. The Entire Change History</h3>
167
+
168
+Both Fossil and Git store history as a directed acyclic graph (DAG)
169
+of changes. But Git tends to focus more on individual branches of
170
+the DAG, whereas Fossil puts more emphasis on the entire DAG.
171
+
172
+For example, the default "sync" behavior in Git is to only sync
173
+a single branch, whereas with Fossil the only sync option it to
174
+sync the entire DAG. Git commands, and Git web interfaces such as
175
+GitHub and/or GitLab, tend to show only a single branch at
176
+a time, whereas Fossil usually shows all parallel branches all at
177
+once. Git has commands like "rebase" that help keep all relevant
178
+changes on a single branch, whereas Fossil encourages a style of
179
+many concurrent branches constantly springing into existance,
180
+undergoing active development in parallel for a few days or weeks, then
181
+merging back into the main line and disappearing.
182
+
183
+This difference in emphasis arises from the different purposes of
184
+the two systems. Git focuses on individual branches, because that
185
+is exactly what you want for a highly-distributed bazaar-style project
186
+such as Linux. Linus Torvalds does not want to see every check-in
187
+by every contributor to Linux, as such extreme visibility does not scale
188
+well. But Fossil was written for the cathedral-style SQLite project
189
+with just a handful of active committers. Seeing all
190
+changes on all branches all at once helps keep the whole team
191
+up-to-date with what everybody else is doing, resulting in a more
192
+tightly focused and cohesive implementation.
193
+
194
+<h3>2.6 Lots of little tools vs. Self-contained system</h3>
165195
166196
Git consists of many small tools, each doing one small part of the job,
167197
which can be recombined (by experts) to perform powerful operations.
168198
Git has a lot of complexity and many dependencies and requires an "installer"
169199
script or program to get it running.
@@ -177,11 +207,11 @@
177207
small tools that collaborate to get the job done. The designer of
178208
Fossil says that the unix philosophy is "it just works". Both
179209
individuals have written their DVCSes to reflect their own view
180210
of the "unix philosophy".
181211
182
-<h3>2.6 One vs. Many Check-outs per Repository</h3>
212
+<h3>2.7 One vs. Many Check-outs per Repository</h3>
183213
184214
A "repository" in Git is a pile-of-files in the ".git" subdirectory
185215
of a single check-out. The check-out and the repository are located
186216
together in the filesystem.
187217
@@ -198,11 +228,11 @@
198228
"[https://git-scm.com/docs/git-worktree|worktree]" command that
199229
allows a single repository to host multiple check-outs. However,
200230
the interface is sufficiently difficult to use that most people
201231
find it easier to create a separate clone for each check-out.
202232
203
-<h3>2.7 What you should have done vs. What you actually did</h3>
233
+<h3>2.8 What you should have done vs. What you actually did</h3>
204234
205235
Git puts a lot of emphasis on maintaining
206236
a "clean" check-in history. Extraneous and experimental branches by
207237
individual developers often never make it into the main repository. And
208238
branches are often rebased before being pushed, to make
@@ -219,11 +249,11 @@
219249
is not a factor.
220250
221251
One commentator has mused that Git records history according to
222252
the victors, whereas Fossil records history as it actually happened.
223253
224
-<h3>2.8 GPL vs. BSD</h3>
254
+<h3>2.9 GPL vs. BSD</h3>
225255
226256
Git is covered by the GPL license whereas Fossil is covered by
227257
a two-clause BSD license.
228258
229259
Consider the difference between GPL and BSD licenses: GPL is designed
@@ -275,14 +305,14 @@
275305
Both Git and Fossil can easily find the ancestors of a check-in. But
276306
only Fossil shows the descendents. (It is possible to find the
277307
descendents of a check-in in Git using the log, but that is sufficiently
278308
difficult that nobody ever actually does it.)
279309
280
- * <b>Wiki, Embedded documentation, Trouble-tickets, and Tech-Notes</b>
310
+ * <b>Wiki, Embedded documentation, Trouble-tickets, Tech-Notes, and Forum</b>
281311
282312
Git only provides versioning of source code. Fossil strives to provide
283
- other related configuration management services as well.
313
+ other related project management services as well.
284314
285315
* <b>Named branches</b>
286316
287317
Branches in Fossil have persistent names that are propagated
288318
to collaborators via [/help?cmd=push|push] and [/help?cmd=pull|pull].
289319
--- www/fossil-v-git.wiki
+++ www/fossil-v-git.wiki
@@ -25,16 +25,18 @@
25 with further description in the text that follows.
26
27 <blockquote><table border=1 cellpadding=5 align=center>
28 <tr><th width="50%">GIT</th><th width="50%">FOSSIL</th></tr>
29 <tr><td>File versioning only</td>
30 <td>Versioning, Tickets, Wiki, and Technotes</td></tr>
31 <tr><td>Ad-hoc, pile-of-files key/value database</td>
32 <td>Relational SQL database</td></tr>
33 <tr><td>Bazaar-style development</td><td>Cathedral-style development</td></tr>
34 <tr><td>Designed for Linux development</td>
35 <td>Designed for SQLite development</td></tr>
 
 
36 <tr><td>Lots of little tools</td><td>Stand-alone executable</td></tr>
37 <tr><td>One check-out per repository</td>
38 <td>Many check-outs per repository</td></tr>
39 <tr><td>Remembers what you should have done</td>
40 <td>Remembers what you actually did</td></tr>
@@ -44,12 +46,12 @@
44 <h3>2.1 Feature Set</h3>
45
46 Git provides file versioning services only, whereas Fossil adds
47 integrated [./wikitheory.wiki | wiki],
48 [./bugtheory.wiki | ticketing &amp; bug tracking],
49 [./embeddeddoc.wiki | embedded documentation], and
50 [./event.wiki | Technical notes].
51 These additional capabilities are available for Git as 3rd-party and/or
52 user-installed add-ons, but with Fossil they are integrated into
53 the design. One way to describe Fossil is that it is
54 "[https://github.com/ | github]-in-a-box".
55
@@ -159,11 +161,39 @@
159 SQLite uses cathedral-style development. 95% of the code in SQLite
160 comes from just three programmers, 64% from just the lead developer.
161 And all SQLite developers know each other well and interact daily.
162 Fossil is designed for this development model.
163
164 <h3>2.5 Lots of little tools vs. Self-contained system</h3>
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
165
166 Git consists of many small tools, each doing one small part of the job,
167 which can be recombined (by experts) to perform powerful operations.
168 Git has a lot of complexity and many dependencies and requires an "installer"
169 script or program to get it running.
@@ -177,11 +207,11 @@
177 small tools that collaborate to get the job done. The designer of
178 Fossil says that the unix philosophy is "it just works". Both
179 individuals have written their DVCSes to reflect their own view
180 of the "unix philosophy".
181
182 <h3>2.6 One vs. Many Check-outs per Repository</h3>
183
184 A "repository" in Git is a pile-of-files in the ".git" subdirectory
185 of a single check-out. The check-out and the repository are located
186 together in the filesystem.
187
@@ -198,11 +228,11 @@
198 "[https://git-scm.com/docs/git-worktree|worktree]" command that
199 allows a single repository to host multiple check-outs. However,
200 the interface is sufficiently difficult to use that most people
201 find it easier to create a separate clone for each check-out.
202
203 <h3>2.7 What you should have done vs. What you actually did</h3>
204
205 Git puts a lot of emphasis on maintaining
206 a "clean" check-in history. Extraneous and experimental branches by
207 individual developers often never make it into the main repository. And
208 branches are often rebased before being pushed, to make
@@ -219,11 +249,11 @@
219 is not a factor.
220
221 One commentator has mused that Git records history according to
222 the victors, whereas Fossil records history as it actually happened.
223
224 <h3>2.8 GPL vs. BSD</h3>
225
226 Git is covered by the GPL license whereas Fossil is covered by
227 a two-clause BSD license.
228
229 Consider the difference between GPL and BSD licenses: GPL is designed
@@ -275,14 +305,14 @@
275 Both Git and Fossil can easily find the ancestors of a check-in. But
276 only Fossil shows the descendents. (It is possible to find the
277 descendents of a check-in in Git using the log, but that is sufficiently
278 difficult that nobody ever actually does it.)
279
280 * <b>Wiki, Embedded documentation, Trouble-tickets, and Tech-Notes</b>
281
282 Git only provides versioning of source code. Fossil strives to provide
283 other related configuration management services as well.
284
285 * <b>Named branches</b>
286
287 Branches in Fossil have persistent names that are propagated
288 to collaborators via [/help?cmd=push|push] and [/help?cmd=pull|pull].
289
--- www/fossil-v-git.wiki
+++ www/fossil-v-git.wiki
@@ -25,16 +25,18 @@
25 with further description in the text that follows.
26
27 <blockquote><table border=1 cellpadding=5 align=center>
28 <tr><th width="50%">GIT</th><th width="50%">FOSSIL</th></tr>
29 <tr><td>File versioning only</td>
30 <td>Versioning, Tickets, Wiki, Technotes, Forum</td></tr>
31 <tr><td>Ad-hoc, pile-of-files key/value database</td>
32 <td>Relational SQL database</td></tr>
33 <tr><td>Bazaar-style development</td><td>Cathedral-style development</td></tr>
34 <tr><td>Designed for Linux development</td>
35 <td>Designed for SQLite development</td></tr>
36 <tr><td>Focus on individual branches</td>
37 <td>Focus on the entire tree of changes</td></tr>
38 <tr><td>Lots of little tools</td><td>Stand-alone executable</td></tr>
39 <tr><td>One check-out per repository</td>
40 <td>Many check-outs per repository</td></tr>
41 <tr><td>Remembers what you should have done</td>
42 <td>Remembers what you actually did</td></tr>
@@ -44,12 +46,12 @@
46 <h3>2.1 Feature Set</h3>
47
48 Git provides file versioning services only, whereas Fossil adds
49 integrated [./wikitheory.wiki | wiki],
50 [./bugtheory.wiki | ticketing &amp; bug tracking],
51 [./embeddeddoc.wiki | embedded documentation],
52 [./event.wiki | Technical notes], and a [./forum.wiki | forum].
53 These additional capabilities are available for Git as 3rd-party and/or
54 user-installed add-ons, but with Fossil they are integrated into
55 the design. One way to describe Fossil is that it is
56 "[https://github.com/ | github]-in-a-box".
57
@@ -159,11 +161,39 @@
161 SQLite uses cathedral-style development. 95% of the code in SQLite
162 comes from just three programmers, 64% from just the lead developer.
163 And all SQLite developers know each other well and interact daily.
164 Fossil is designed for this development model.
165
166 <h3>2.5 Individual Branches vs. The Entire Change History</h3>
167
168 Both Fossil and Git store history as a directed acyclic graph (DAG)
169 of changes. But Git tends to focus more on individual branches of
170 the DAG, whereas Fossil puts more emphasis on the entire DAG.
171
172 For example, the default "sync" behavior in Git is to only sync
173 a single branch, whereas with Fossil the only sync option it to
174 sync the entire DAG. Git commands, and Git web interfaces such as
175 GitHub and/or GitLab, tend to show only a single branch at
176 a time, whereas Fossil usually shows all parallel branches all at
177 once. Git has commands like "rebase" that help keep all relevant
178 changes on a single branch, whereas Fossil encourages a style of
179 many concurrent branches constantly springing into existance,
180 undergoing active development in parallel for a few days or weeks, then
181 merging back into the main line and disappearing.
182
183 This difference in emphasis arises from the different purposes of
184 the two systems. Git focuses on individual branches, because that
185 is exactly what you want for a highly-distributed bazaar-style project
186 such as Linux. Linus Torvalds does not want to see every check-in
187 by every contributor to Linux, as such extreme visibility does not scale
188 well. But Fossil was written for the cathedral-style SQLite project
189 with just a handful of active committers. Seeing all
190 changes on all branches all at once helps keep the whole team
191 up-to-date with what everybody else is doing, resulting in a more
192 tightly focused and cohesive implementation.
193
194 <h3>2.6 Lots of little tools vs. Self-contained system</h3>
195
196 Git consists of many small tools, each doing one small part of the job,
197 which can be recombined (by experts) to perform powerful operations.
198 Git has a lot of complexity and many dependencies and requires an "installer"
199 script or program to get it running.
@@ -177,11 +207,11 @@
207 small tools that collaborate to get the job done. The designer of
208 Fossil says that the unix philosophy is "it just works". Both
209 individuals have written their DVCSes to reflect their own view
210 of the "unix philosophy".
211
212 <h3>2.7 One vs. Many Check-outs per Repository</h3>
213
214 A "repository" in Git is a pile-of-files in the ".git" subdirectory
215 of a single check-out. The check-out and the repository are located
216 together in the filesystem.
217
@@ -198,11 +228,11 @@
228 "[https://git-scm.com/docs/git-worktree|worktree]" command that
229 allows a single repository to host multiple check-outs. However,
230 the interface is sufficiently difficult to use that most people
231 find it easier to create a separate clone for each check-out.
232
233 <h3>2.8 What you should have done vs. What you actually did</h3>
234
235 Git puts a lot of emphasis on maintaining
236 a "clean" check-in history. Extraneous and experimental branches by
237 individual developers often never make it into the main repository. And
238 branches are often rebased before being pushed, to make
@@ -219,11 +249,11 @@
249 is not a factor.
250
251 One commentator has mused that Git records history according to
252 the victors, whereas Fossil records history as it actually happened.
253
254 <h3>2.9 GPL vs. BSD</h3>
255
256 Git is covered by the GPL license whereas Fossil is covered by
257 a two-clause BSD license.
258
259 Consider the difference between GPL and BSD licenses: GPL is designed
@@ -275,14 +305,14 @@
305 Both Git and Fossil can easily find the ancestors of a check-in. But
306 only Fossil shows the descendents. (It is possible to find the
307 descendents of a check-in in Git using the log, but that is sufficiently
308 difficult that nobody ever actually does it.)
309
310 * <b>Wiki, Embedded documentation, Trouble-tickets, Tech-Notes, and Forum</b>
311
312 Git only provides versioning of source code. Fossil strives to provide
313 other related project management services as well.
314
315 * <b>Named branches</b>
316
317 Branches in Fossil have persistent names that are propagated
318 to collaborators via [/help?cmd=push|push] and [/help?cmd=pull|pull].
319
+3 -2
--- www/index.wiki
+++ www/index.wiki
@@ -62,12 +62,13 @@
6262
[./stats.wiki | bandwidth efficient] to the point that Fossil can be
6363
used comfortably over dial-up or over the exceedingly slow Wifi on
6464
airliners.
6565
6666
5. <b>CGI/SCGI Enabled</b> - No server is required, but if you want to
67
- set one up, Fossil supports four easy
68
- [./server.wiki | server configurations].
67
+ set one up, Fossil supports four easy [./server.wiki | server configurations].
68
+ You can also easily set up your server to automatically
69
+ [./mirrortogithub.md | mirror content on GitHub].
6970
7071
6. <b>Autosync</b> -
7172
Fossil supports [./concepts.wiki#workflow | "autosync" mode]
7273
which helps to keep projects moving
7374
forward by reducing the amount of needless
7475
--- www/index.wiki
+++ www/index.wiki
@@ -62,12 +62,13 @@
62 [./stats.wiki | bandwidth efficient] to the point that Fossil can be
63 used comfortably over dial-up or over the exceedingly slow Wifi on
64 airliners.
65
66 5. <b>CGI/SCGI Enabled</b> - No server is required, but if you want to
67 set one up, Fossil supports four easy
68 [./server.wiki | server configurations].
 
69
70 6. <b>Autosync</b> -
71 Fossil supports [./concepts.wiki#workflow | "autosync" mode]
72 which helps to keep projects moving
73 forward by reducing the amount of needless
74
--- www/index.wiki
+++ www/index.wiki
@@ -62,12 +62,13 @@
62 [./stats.wiki | bandwidth efficient] to the point that Fossil can be
63 used comfortably over dial-up or over the exceedingly slow Wifi on
64 airliners.
65
66 5. <b>CGI/SCGI Enabled</b> - No server is required, but if you want to
67 set one up, Fossil supports four easy [./server.wiki | server configurations].
68 You can also easily set up your server to automatically
69 [./mirrortogithub.md | mirror content on GitHub].
70
71 6. <b>Autosync</b> -
72 Fossil supports [./concepts.wiki#workflow | "autosync" mode]
73 which helps to keep projects moving
74 forward by reducing the amount of needless
75
--- www/inout.wiki
+++ www/inout.wiki
@@ -48,10 +48,19 @@
4848
since the git-fast-export file format is currently the only VCS interchange
4949
format that Fossil will generate. However,
5050
future versions of Fossil might add the ability to generate other
5151
VCS interchange formats, and so for compatibility, the use of the --git
5252
option recommended.
53
+
54
+<h2>Mirror A Fossil Repository In Git</h2>
55
+
56
+Fossil version 2.9 and later supports a simple mechanism for
57
+doing a Git or
58
+[./mirrortogithub.md|GitHub mirror of a Fossil repository].
59
+See that separate document for details. Fossil is self-hosting,
60
+but a [https://github.com/drhsqlite/fossil-mirror|GitHub mirror of Fossil]
61
+is available as a proof-of-concept.
5362
5463
<h2>Bidirectional Synchronization</h2>
5564
Fossil also has the ability to synchronize with a Git repository via repeated
5665
imports and/or exports. To do this, it uses marks files to store a record of
5766
artifacts which are known by both Git and Fossil to exist at a given point in
5867
--- www/inout.wiki
+++ www/inout.wiki
@@ -48,10 +48,19 @@
48 since the git-fast-export file format is currently the only VCS interchange
49 format that Fossil will generate. However,
50 future versions of Fossil might add the ability to generate other
51 VCS interchange formats, and so for compatibility, the use of the --git
52 option recommended.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
53
54 <h2>Bidirectional Synchronization</h2>
55 Fossil also has the ability to synchronize with a Git repository via repeated
56 imports and/or exports. To do this, it uses marks files to store a record of
57 artifacts which are known by both Git and Fossil to exist at a given point in
58
--- www/inout.wiki
+++ www/inout.wiki
@@ -48,10 +48,19 @@
48 since the git-fast-export file format is currently the only VCS interchange
49 format that Fossil will generate. However,
50 future versions of Fossil might add the ability to generate other
51 VCS interchange formats, and so for compatibility, the use of the --git
52 option recommended.
53
54 <h2>Mirror A Fossil Repository In Git</h2>
55
56 Fossil version 2.9 and later supports a simple mechanism for
57 doing a Git or
58 [./mirrortogithub.md|GitHub mirror of a Fossil repository].
59 See that separate document for details. Fossil is self-hosting,
60 but a [https://github.com/drhsqlite/fossil-mirror|GitHub mirror of Fossil]
61 is available as a proof-of-concept.
62
63 <h2>Bidirectional Synchronization</h2>
64 Fossil also has the ability to synchronize with a Git repository via repeated
65 imports and/or exports. To do this, it uses marks files to store a record of
66 artifacts which are known by both Git and Fossil to exist at a given point in
67
--- www/selfhost.wiki
+++ www/selfhost.wiki
@@ -10,10 +10,12 @@
1010
1111
The canonical repository is (1). Repositories (2) and (3) automatically
1212
stay in synchronization with (1) via a
1313
<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cron">cron job</a> that invokes
1414
"fossil sync" at regular intervals.
15
+Repository (2) also publishes a
16
+[./mirrortogithub.md|GitHub mirror of Fossil] as a demonstration.
1517
1618
Note that the two secondary repositories are more than just read-only mirrors.
1719
All three servers support full read/write capabilities.
1820
Changes (such as new tickets or wiki or check-ins) can be implemented
1921
on any of the three servers and those changes automatically propagate to the
@@ -67,6 +69,8 @@
6769
</pre></blockquote>
6870
6971
Server (2) is a
7072
<a href="http://www.linode.com/">Linode 4096</a> located in Newark, NJ
7173
and set up just like the canonical server (1) with the addition of a
72
-cron job for synchronization as in server (3).
74
+cron job for synchronization. The same cron job also runs the
75
+[/help?cmd=git|fossil git export] command after each sync in order to
76
+[./mirrortogithub.md|mirror all changes to GitHub].
7377
--- www/selfhost.wiki
+++ www/selfhost.wiki
@@ -10,10 +10,12 @@
10
11 The canonical repository is (1). Repositories (2) and (3) automatically
12 stay in synchronization with (1) via a
13 <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cron">cron job</a> that invokes
14 "fossil sync" at regular intervals.
 
 
15
16 Note that the two secondary repositories are more than just read-only mirrors.
17 All three servers support full read/write capabilities.
18 Changes (such as new tickets or wiki or check-ins) can be implemented
19 on any of the three servers and those changes automatically propagate to the
@@ -67,6 +69,8 @@
67 </pre></blockquote>
68
69 Server (2) is a
70 <a href="http://www.linode.com/">Linode 4096</a> located in Newark, NJ
71 and set up just like the canonical server (1) with the addition of a
72 cron job for synchronization as in server (3).
 
 
73
--- www/selfhost.wiki
+++ www/selfhost.wiki
@@ -10,10 +10,12 @@
10
11 The canonical repository is (1). Repositories (2) and (3) automatically
12 stay in synchronization with (1) via a
13 <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cron">cron job</a> that invokes
14 "fossil sync" at regular intervals.
15 Repository (2) also publishes a
16 [./mirrortogithub.md|GitHub mirror of Fossil] as a demonstration.
17
18 Note that the two secondary repositories are more than just read-only mirrors.
19 All three servers support full read/write capabilities.
20 Changes (such as new tickets or wiki or check-ins) can be implemented
21 on any of the three servers and those changes automatically propagate to the
@@ -67,6 +69,8 @@
69 </pre></blockquote>
70
71 Server (2) is a
72 <a href="http://www.linode.com/">Linode 4096</a> located in Newark, NJ
73 and set up just like the canonical server (1) with the addition of a
74 cron job for synchronization. The same cron job also runs the
75 [/help?cmd=git|fossil git export] command after each sync in order to
76 [./mirrortogithub.md|mirror all changes to GitHub].
77
--- www/webui.wiki
+++ www/webui.wiki
@@ -6,10 +6,11 @@
66
77
* [./bugtheory.wiki | Ticketing and bug tracking]
88
* [./wikitheory.wiki | Wiki]
99
* [./embeddeddoc.wiki | On-line documentation]
1010
* [./event.wiki | Technical notes]
11
+ * [./forum.wiki | Forum]
1112
* Timelines
1213
* Full text search over all of the above
1314
* Status information
1415
* Graphs of revision and branching history
1516
* File and version lists and differences
1617
--- www/webui.wiki
+++ www/webui.wiki
@@ -6,10 +6,11 @@
6
7 * [./bugtheory.wiki | Ticketing and bug tracking]
8 * [./wikitheory.wiki | Wiki]
9 * [./embeddeddoc.wiki | On-line documentation]
10 * [./event.wiki | Technical notes]
 
11 * Timelines
12 * Full text search over all of the above
13 * Status information
14 * Graphs of revision and branching history
15 * File and version lists and differences
16
--- www/webui.wiki
+++ www/webui.wiki
@@ -6,10 +6,11 @@
6
7 * [./bugtheory.wiki | Ticketing and bug tracking]
8 * [./wikitheory.wiki | Wiki]
9 * [./embeddeddoc.wiki | On-line documentation]
10 * [./event.wiki | Technical notes]
11 * [./forum.wiki | Forum]
12 * Timelines
13 * Full text search over all of the above
14 * Status information
15 * Graphs of revision and branching history
16 * File and version lists and differences
17
--- www/wikitheory.wiki
+++ www/wikitheory.wiki
@@ -8,10 +8,12 @@
88
* Description and comments in [./bugtheory.wiki | bug reports].
99
* Check-in comments.
1010
* [./embeddeddoc.wiki | Embedded documentation] files whose
1111
name ends in ".wiki" or ".md" or ".markdown".
1212
* [./event.wiki | Technical notes].
13
+ * [./forum.wiki | Forum messages].
14
+ * Auxiliary notes on check-ins and branches.
1315
1416
The [/wiki_rules | formatting rules for fossil wiki]
1517
are designed to be simple and intuitive. The idea is that wiki provides
1618
paragraph breaks, numbered and bulleted lists, and hyperlinking for
1719
simple documents together with a safe subset of HTML for more complex
@@ -56,11 +58,28 @@
5658
use the exact same markup. Some projects may choose to
5759
use both forms of documentation at the same time. Because the same
5860
format is used, it is trivial to move a file from wiki to embedded documentation
5961
or back again as the project evolves.
6062
61
-<h2>Bug-reports and check-in comments</h2>
63
+<h2>Bug-reports and check-in comments and Forum messages</h2>
6264
6365
The comments on check-ins and the text in the descriptions of bug reports
6466
both use wiki formatting. Exactly the same set of formatting rules apply.
6567
There is never a need to learn one formatting language for documentation
6668
and a different markup for bugs or for check-in comments.
69
+
70
+<h2>Auxiliary notes attached to check-ins or branches</h2>
71
+
72
+Stand-alone wiki pages with special names "branch/<i>BRANCHNAME</i>"
73
+or "checkin/<i>HASH</i>" are associated with the corresponding
74
+branch or check-in. The wiki text appears in an "About" section of
75
+timelines and info screens. Examples:
76
+
77
+ * [/timeline?r=graph-test-branch] shows the text of the
78
+ [/wiki?name=branch/graph-test-branch|branch/graph-test-branch]
79
+ wiki page at the top of the timeline
80
+ * [/info/19c60b7fc9e2] shows the text of the
81
+ [/wiki?name=checkin/19c60b7fc9e2400e56a6f938bbad0e34ca746ca2eabdecac10945539f1f5e8c6|checkin/19c60b7fc9e2...]
82
+ wiki page in the "About" section.
83
+
84
+This special wiki pages are very useful for recording historical
85
+notes.
6786
--- www/wikitheory.wiki
+++ www/wikitheory.wiki
@@ -8,10 +8,12 @@
8 * Description and comments in [./bugtheory.wiki | bug reports].
9 * Check-in comments.
10 * [./embeddeddoc.wiki | Embedded documentation] files whose
11 name ends in ".wiki" or ".md" or ".markdown".
12 * [./event.wiki | Technical notes].
 
 
13
14 The [/wiki_rules | formatting rules for fossil wiki]
15 are designed to be simple and intuitive. The idea is that wiki provides
16 paragraph breaks, numbered and bulleted lists, and hyperlinking for
17 simple documents together with a safe subset of HTML for more complex
@@ -56,11 +58,28 @@
56 use the exact same markup. Some projects may choose to
57 use both forms of documentation at the same time. Because the same
58 format is used, it is trivial to move a file from wiki to embedded documentation
59 or back again as the project evolves.
60
61 <h2>Bug-reports and check-in comments</h2>
62
63 The comments on check-ins and the text in the descriptions of bug reports
64 both use wiki formatting. Exactly the same set of formatting rules apply.
65 There is never a need to learn one formatting language for documentation
66 and a different markup for bugs or for check-in comments.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
67
--- www/wikitheory.wiki
+++ www/wikitheory.wiki
@@ -8,10 +8,12 @@
8 * Description and comments in [./bugtheory.wiki | bug reports].
9 * Check-in comments.
10 * [./embeddeddoc.wiki | Embedded documentation] files whose
11 name ends in ".wiki" or ".md" or ".markdown".
12 * [./event.wiki | Technical notes].
13 * [./forum.wiki | Forum messages].
14 * Auxiliary notes on check-ins and branches.
15
16 The [/wiki_rules | formatting rules for fossil wiki]
17 are designed to be simple and intuitive. The idea is that wiki provides
18 paragraph breaks, numbered and bulleted lists, and hyperlinking for
19 simple documents together with a safe subset of HTML for more complex
@@ -56,11 +58,28 @@
58 use the exact same markup. Some projects may choose to
59 use both forms of documentation at the same time. Because the same
60 format is used, it is trivial to move a file from wiki to embedded documentation
61 or back again as the project evolves.
62
63 <h2>Bug-reports and check-in comments and Forum messages</h2>
64
65 The comments on check-ins and the text in the descriptions of bug reports
66 both use wiki formatting. Exactly the same set of formatting rules apply.
67 There is never a need to learn one formatting language for documentation
68 and a different markup for bugs or for check-in comments.
69
70 <h2>Auxiliary notes attached to check-ins or branches</h2>
71
72 Stand-alone wiki pages with special names "branch/<i>BRANCHNAME</i>"
73 or "checkin/<i>HASH</i>" are associated with the corresponding
74 branch or check-in. The wiki text appears in an "About" section of
75 timelines and info screens. Examples:
76
77 * [/timeline?r=graph-test-branch] shows the text of the
78 [/wiki?name=branch/graph-test-branch|branch/graph-test-branch]
79 wiki page at the top of the timeline
80 * [/info/19c60b7fc9e2] shows the text of the
81 [/wiki?name=checkin/19c60b7fc9e2400e56a6f938bbad0e34ca746ca2eabdecac10945539f1f5e8c6|checkin/19c60b7fc9e2...]
82 wiki page in the "About" section.
83
84 This special wiki pages are very useful for recording historical
85 notes.
86

Keyboard Shortcuts

Open search /
Next entry (timeline) j
Previous entry (timeline) k
Open focused entry Enter
Show this help ?
Toggle theme Top nav button