Fossil SCM
Another bit of prose polishing in fossil-v-git
Commit
fcdefd97a74ebb7c141eac3dec7b6336fae66eb3152170a63c41c0b060292851
Parent
eebd7135117f4b3…
1 file changed
+5
-5
+5
-5
| --- www/fossil-v-git.wiki | ||
| +++ www/fossil-v-git.wiki | ||
| @@ -129,17 +129,17 @@ | ||
| 129 | 129 | [https://www.kernel.org/|the Linux kernel], and |
| 130 | 130 | [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/D._Richard_Hipp|D. Richard Hipp] designed |
| 131 | 131 | Fossil to support the development of [https://sqlite.org/|SQLite]. |
| 132 | 132 | SQLite is much more widely deployed than the Linux kernel, but for |
| 133 | 133 | Linux-based systems, the kernel is the more fundamental component. |
| 134 | -Although both projects must rank high on any objective list of "most | |
| 135 | -important FOSS projects," the two projects are almost entirely unlike | |
| 134 | +Both projects must rank high on any objective list of "most | |
| 135 | +important FOSS projects," yet these two projects are almost entirely unlike | |
| 136 | 136 | one another. |
| 137 | 137 | |
| 138 | -In the following three sections, we will explain the key differences in | |
| 139 | -Linux vs. SQLite which affected the designed-in low-friction usage path | |
| 140 | -for the DVCSes created to support each one's development. | |
| 138 | +In the following sections, we will explain how three key differences | |
| 139 | +between Linux and SQLite dictated the design of each DVCS's low-friction | |
| 140 | +usage path. | |
| 141 | 141 | |
| 142 | 142 | When deciding between these two DVCSes, you should ask yourself, "Is my |
| 143 | 143 | project more like Linux or more like SQLite?" |
| 144 | 144 | |
| 145 | 145 | |
| 146 | 146 |
| --- www/fossil-v-git.wiki | |
| +++ www/fossil-v-git.wiki | |
| @@ -129,17 +129,17 @@ | |
| 129 | [https://www.kernel.org/|the Linux kernel], and |
| 130 | [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/D._Richard_Hipp|D. Richard Hipp] designed |
| 131 | Fossil to support the development of [https://sqlite.org/|SQLite]. |
| 132 | SQLite is much more widely deployed than the Linux kernel, but for |
| 133 | Linux-based systems, the kernel is the more fundamental component. |
| 134 | Although both projects must rank high on any objective list of "most |
| 135 | important FOSS projects," the two projects are almost entirely unlike |
| 136 | one another. |
| 137 | |
| 138 | In the following three sections, we will explain the key differences in |
| 139 | Linux vs. SQLite which affected the designed-in low-friction usage path |
| 140 | for the DVCSes created to support each one's development. |
| 141 | |
| 142 | When deciding between these two DVCSes, you should ask yourself, "Is my |
| 143 | project more like Linux or more like SQLite?" |
| 144 | |
| 145 | |
| 146 |
| --- www/fossil-v-git.wiki | |
| +++ www/fossil-v-git.wiki | |
| @@ -129,17 +129,17 @@ | |
| 129 | [https://www.kernel.org/|the Linux kernel], and |
| 130 | [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/D._Richard_Hipp|D. Richard Hipp] designed |
| 131 | Fossil to support the development of [https://sqlite.org/|SQLite]. |
| 132 | SQLite is much more widely deployed than the Linux kernel, but for |
| 133 | Linux-based systems, the kernel is the more fundamental component. |
| 134 | Both projects must rank high on any objective list of "most |
| 135 | important FOSS projects," yet these two projects are almost entirely unlike |
| 136 | one another. |
| 137 | |
| 138 | In the following sections, we will explain how three key differences |
| 139 | between Linux and SQLite dictated the design of each DVCS's low-friction |
| 140 | usage path. |
| 141 | |
| 142 | When deciding between these two DVCSes, you should ask yourself, "Is my |
| 143 | project more like Linux or more like SQLite?" |
| 144 | |
| 145 | |
| 146 |